Undergraduate College: The Pennsylvania State University
Undergraduate Area of Study: Engineering/Technology
MCAT: BS 14, PS 13, VR 9, M
Overall GPA: 3.83
Science GPA: 3.94
Brief Profile:
Pitt Med Class of 2016!!
** Scroll all the way down for school reviews. Just click the green school names **
If you have any questions at all, feel free to PM me on SDN :)
10/6/12: Threads on SDN that I found to be useful. This is mostly just a re-post, but added some organization to it. I hope you'll find them helpful.
When schools can see your acceptances:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=4789434&postcount=15
Excellent application advice:
http://mediasite.hs.washington.edu/Mediasite/Play/5092d8383fdd42a98bb00ae464dfe643
Advice from MS4s:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=104541
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=955652
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=820524
An entire thread of advice for incoming MS1s:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=95608
Match list:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=12125588&postcount=8
Application advice from an MS1:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=824137
LizzyM's ask me anything (she's an adcom):
2011: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=877440
2012: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=972513
Med school tiers:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=8012424&postcount=18
Tell me about yourself:
http://studentdoctor.net/2008/02/trick-question/
School feedback page. Choose a school >> interview feedback >> view survey results >> scroll down to questions >> scroll down and find a TON of useful information (impressions, interview questions, etc.):
http://studentdoctor.net/schools/?view=allopathic
Medical School Matriculants Data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKVGWwobG5GdEx2MjlBTDE0bXFXNGFZczZqYTZKb2c&hl=en_US#gid=0
Medical School Curricula and Evaulation:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AljTNZe5EtqgdG5qTzFld1pxelY2M0llcVk4b292ZHc
Panda Bear's personal statement:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=285834
6/25/12: As requested, my GPA trend:
HS: 12 AP credits (Java, Calculus AB, BC)
Fa06: 3.87 // 16 cr
Sp07: 4.00 // 17 cr
Fa07: 3.90 // 19 cr
Sp08: 3.92 // 13 cr (dropped a 3 cr class in the beginning, didn't show up on transcript)
Su08: 4.00 // 7 cr
Fa08: 3.71 // 16 cr
Sp09: 3.94 // 16 cr (dropped a 3 cr class halfway through, W on transcript)
Su09: 4.00 // 7.5 cr
Fa09: 3.56 // 18 cr Semester From Hell! :(
Sp10: 3.53 // 15 cr
Thesis written/defended in 2011
pretty much a downward trend, but that's engineering for ya lol
5/31/12: My personal ranking of the seven schools at which I interviewed:
1. Pittsburgh - pros: fantastic reputation, research, UPMC, colleges everywhere you turn, most livable city (according to Forbes); cons: 5 hours away from home
2. Temple - pros: solid reputation where I live, 2 hours from home, philly would be fun; cons: undergrad isn't nearby, bad neighborhood
3. Rochester - pros: double helix curriculum, reputation for academic medicine, snow; cons: 4 hours from home, lectures not recorded (attendance isn't mandatory though)
5. TCMC - pros: close to home (~40 minutes), cheap housing, third year curriculum seemed interesting, will likely affiliate with U of Scranton; cons: new school that needs to prove itself, lots of driving to scattered clinical sites, not sure about research
4. Einstein - pros: lots of family in NYC, P/F unranked; cons: depending on traffic, could be anywhere from 2 to 5 hours away from home, didn't see much of the school on interview day
6. Hofstra - pros: lots of clinical exp first two years; cons: new school that needs to prove itself, lots of driving to scattered clinical sites (nyc traffic makes this worse), long island is expensive
7. Albany - pros: interviewer was awesome; cons: h/hp/p/f, stand alone med school (no undergrad), didn't see much of the school on interview day
5/28/12: A little info on my school list selection. My original list didn't include: Johns Hopkins, Pritzker, Northwestern, Harvard, Columbia, Yale, Cornell, Dartmouth, Mount Sinai, NYU, and Brown (but of course Pitt and Penn were on my list since I'm a PA resident). I was trying to be reasonable with my school selection by averaging my MCAT scores to a 32 or 33 and then determining where I'd be competitive. I was persuaded to apply to those above mentioned schools as last minute add-ons because most, if not all of them, have a reputation for generous need-based aid. Better schools have better endowment which translates to better scholarship funds. Coming from a low-income family, that was enough for me to apply and hope for the best. I should also note though that I did not apply economically disadvantaged nor did I apply for the Fee Assistance Program (actually I didn't even realize I would have qualified for the FAP until too late haha. oh well.) My Temple and Albany interviewers both asked me why I didn't apply economically disadvantaged. I basically answered that I didn't feel to be at any real disadvantage just because of my low family income. Coincidentally, those were my two outright acceptances, not sure whether that had anything to do with it. Of all those ridiculously competitive top 20 schools I applied to, I actually managed to score one acceptance. The result: $36k need-based scholarship (highest available amount Pitt awards, re-evaluated each year). So was it worth it to apply so top heavy? Yeah. Definitely.
5/17/12: Personal Statement added and lots up updates throughout. I'm trying my best to make this useful for those getting ready to apply.
5/10/12: Was the famous LizzyM score predictive for me? For those who are unaware, the LizzyM score is simply the school's average GPA*10 + MCAT - 1 whereas your LizzyM score is GPA*10 + MCAT + 1 and is used to roughly gage where you might be competitive. It can be very useful for some people when deciding where to apply to give yourself the best chances.
My LizzyM score for second MCAT is 3.83*10 + 36 + 1 = 75.3
My LizzyM score for first MCAT is 3.83*10 + 28 + 1 = 67.3
My average LizzyM score = 71.3
Penn................75.1......Rejected
Hopkins..........74.1......Rejected
Pritzker.............74.0......Rejected
Harvard............73.7......Rejected
Columbia.........73.7......Rejected
Yale...................73.4......Rejected
Cornell..............72.6......Rejected
Pittsburgh.........72.4......Interviewed, Waitlisted, Accepted
Dartmouth........72.0......Rejected
Mount Sinai......71.4......Rejected
NYU...................70.5......Rejected
Brown................70.5......Rejected
Einstein.............69.8......Interviewed, Waitlisted
Rochester.........69.4......Interviewed, Waitlisted
Jefferson..........68.1......Rejected
Albany...............67.9......Interviewed, Accepted
Temple.............67.9......Interviewed, Accepted
Hofstra..............67.6......Interviewed, Waitlisted
NYMC................67.0......Rejected
Drexel...............66.1......Rejected
Penn State.......66.0......Rejected
TCMC................66.0......Interviewed, Rejected
It feels like the average of my two LizzyM scores (71.3) would have been more predictive of my outcome this cycle, which might be a result of a few things: 1. Lateness of my application probably bumped my higher LizzyM down a few points alone. 2. I'm a fairly boring cookie-cutter premed on paper, which might have also taken away a point or two. 3. Who knows? There are a lot of variables in this game that aren't accounted for by GPA and MCAT alone.
5/8/12: Updated review of Pitt Med below. So check that out if you're interested.
5/3/12: Game Over. I decided it was only fitting to withdraw from Temple first since they accepted me first. It was NOT easy to hit the send button on that email. Withdrew from Temple, Albany, Rochester, Hofstra, and Einstein. It's official. Matriculating at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine!!
5/1/12: Received my financial aid package from Pitt. I'm not sure whether I want to disclose the amount on here, but it's very "convincing"
4/30/12: A little bit of post-interview analysis, though I'm not sure how helpful this will actually be to anyone. I ranked all twelve individual interviews (F for faculty and S for student) according to how I felt I performed from 1 (worst) to 12 (best) and included the current post-interview decisions.
Albany............F12..............Accepted
Temple..........F9, S11.......Accepted
TCMC............F10, S4.......Rejected
Pitt..................F6, S8.........Waitlsted, Accepted
Hofstra..........F7, F5..........Waitlsted
Rochester.....F3, F2.........Waitlisted
Einstein.........F1...............High Priority Waitlisted
Some interesting things to note:
1. No ethical questions were ever thrown my way. And only a couple very easy healthcare questions were asked.
2. Stress level at all interviews were much lower than expected.
3. I fully expected to get rejected from Einstein. I'm very glad to still be under consideration there. This also proves how subjective my ranking is. I thought I did horribly here -- my interviewer obviously did not.
4. I didn't realize how badly I did with my Rochester interviews until I actually took time to compare all of my interviews. I'm surprised I was waitlisted here too, instead of just getting rejected. Then again, there was quite a difference between my Rochester interviews and my Einstein interview which isn't apparent from my imperfect method of ranking.
5. Rejected at TCMC. I know my student interview was pretty dry, but my faculty interview went great. He spent quite a bit of time stroking my ego telling me about all the parts of my application he liked. He assured me that his recommendation would be favorable. Not that I've lost any sleep over it, but I have wondered what might have been the reason for getting rejected here. Possible reason A: I gave off a bad vibe during my interview(s). Can't rule this out. This was my last interview, so maybe I was a little too nonchalant. Possible reason B: not a right fit for the mission of the school. I expressed during the interviews that I was very interested in research, academic medicine, and have given thoughts to pursuing an MBA. Perhaps the school wanted an applicant that was less about academic medicine and more about practicing medicine for the underserved in NEPA. This reason seems unlikely given that I clearly expressed my interests in the secondary application,which I assume was read before granting an interview. If they didn't like me on paper, why interview me? Possible reason C: I might have been seen as low-yield. At the time the admissions committee made their decision, they could see that I was holding acceptances at Temple, Albany, and Pittsburgh, and might have decided that I was unlikely to accept their offer of admission. I'm not sure whether schools actually do this, but if they did, I would be intrigued. Because at this point, I wouldn't choose TCMC over Pitt, though I wasn't yet accepted to Pitt when I interviewed at TCMC. If this was their reason, then it was a good call. Anyway, the real reason is probably some reason "D", which I haven't figured out. I have no idea what goes on in admissions, as you can see.
4/20/12: Rejected from TCMC, which is my first post-interview rejection. I can't think of anything that went badly on interview day. Oh well, can't win 'em all, right?
4/18/12: At the beginning of the application cycle, I figured if any school would be labeled a "safety school" for me, it would be Penn State. Well, finally got the rejection today from my alma mater. You really can't predict these things ahead of time. People on SDN like to call this application process a crapshoot. I'd have to agree on that. So long PSU, it's been fun.
4/10/12: High priority waitlist at Einstein. I'm actually quite surprised I wasn't just rejected. As I mentioned in the school review below, I was very tired during this interview and thought I had made a poor impression. Either the interview didn't weigh as heavily as I thought or I didn't make as bad an impression as I thought.
4/4/12: Accepted to Pittsburgh!! Can't even describe how happy I am :D
4/3/12: Interview season is over for me. I have written reviews for all seven schools I interviewed at, so feel free to check those out below and ask any questions you may have. As fun as it was to learn about schools, I'm glad interviews are over with. (until it comes time to match!)
3/26/12: Waitlisted at Hofstra
3/15/12: Yale rejection today. That makes 7 Ivy pre-interview rejections out of 7. I knew I wasn't a strong candidate for the top schools, but felt it was worth a shot anyway. Oh well, no biggie ;) Einstein interview in the morning. I've noticed an unhappy trend though lol. Within 24 hours of my last three interviews, I've had somewhat disappointing news: waitlisted at Rochester before Hofstra interview, rejected from Mt. Sinai before Albany interview (I really shouldn't have checked my email before leaving the hotel), and now rejected from Yale before Einstein interview. I assume the remaining schools I have yet to hear from (PSU, NYMC, Jeff, Drexel, Hopkins) are all rejections at this point. I can't complain with how many interviews I've received. Definitely more than I expected!
3/8/12: Accepted to Albany Med!!
2/17/12: I'm disappointed about being waitlisted at Rochester but had a great day at Hofstra. I'll write up my review of Hofstra sometime next week.
2/8/12: II today from TCMC :) This new school is pretty close to home, so I'm really looking forward to it.
1/29/12: Alright, I wrote up my school impression for Pittsburgh, so check that out if you're interested (just click on the school name below). Check back later for Temple and Rochester. Writing them out helps me to organize my thoughts and should help me make my final decision in the coming months. I know reading other people's MDapps helped me out, so hopefully this will help out some people too. Please feel free to leave a comment or PM me on SDN if you prefer.
1/26/12: Make that three straight Ivy rejections. I must like really suck or something. Blah. Just got back from my Rochester interview. I didn't really know much about the school going in, but now I am praying for an acceptance. I'll probably start to write up some school impressions now that I have visited a few and actually have things to compare. I'll work on them soon.
1/25/12: Not getting much love from the Ivies -- two rejections in two weeks. I'd probably care more if I didn't have an acceptance yet. But I do! Their loss ;)
1/10/12: Happy New Year to you and thanks for visiting my MD app page! 2012 is starting off great with an interview invitation from Albany Medical College :) That's my sixth interview invite! I can't believe it.
12/20/11: Received a phone call from the professor who interviewed me... accepted to TEMPLE! Best Christmas present ever!
****************************************************************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************************************************************
About me: I'm a pretty average guy, average applicant, with a little higher than average numbers. Oh yeah, and Jesse is actually my turtle, not me ;p
School: The Pennsylvania State University - Schreyer Honors College
Major: Engineering Science
GPA: 3.83
sGPA: 3.94
My major was reasonably difficult. I took many more honors courses than were required and two very cool grad level courses. I graduated with about 30 more credits than needed.
1st MCAT: 11P / 6V / 11B = 28Q
2nd MCAT: 13P / 9V / 14B = 36M (Test Date: August 5, 2011)
MCAT Prep: For the first MCAT, I definitely underestimated it and studied with EK (http://www.amazon.com/Examkrackers-Complete-MCAT-Study-Pkg/dp/1893858499/ref=pd_sim_b_1) about 3 or 4 weeks prior to the exam. Horrible, horrible idea. I didn't take any practice exams so I had no idea where I stood. I studied considerably longer the second time around, but still didn't take any practice exams (money was tight and had to save up for applications) so, again, I didn't really know what to expect. I focused a lot on EK Verbal 101 and was scoring 10s and 11s. I was hoping to at least score an 8 on test day. For the sciences, I liked this site a lot (http://mcat-review.org/) and highly recommend it. I also read a good deal of TBR bio (http://www.berkeley-review.com/TBR/home-study.html), but not all of it. That's about it in terms of PS and BS prep. Needless to say, I was very pleasantly surprised when I received my second set of scores. Fun fact: I almost voided my second MCAT because I thought I might have scored < 28. Seriously. I felt worse after the second MCAT than I did after the first MCAT. Go figure that out lol. Here were my thoughts after the second MCAT: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=11410252&postcount=182. Oh and in case you're wondering how I dropped from a Q to an M on the writing section, I actually gave it a good effort the first time didn't care the second time. Unless your writing score is really high or really low, adcoms don't care about it. So if they don't care, why should I? I spent about 10-15 minutes on each essay and spent the rest of the time with my head down getting a little rest before the BS section. Kind of like a power nap but I wasn't sleeping lol. So yeah, I literally half-assed the writing section.
ECs:
- hospital volunteering: 375 hours over 2 years (emergency department, patient floors, surgical medical center, pharmacy, endoscopy) + lots of training new volunteers + part of an ad hoc group to improve training of new volunteers (strong LOR #1)
- dentist office volunteering + shadowing
- research: honors research thesis during senior year + lighter research during sophomore and junior years (no publications) (strong LOR #2)
- shadowing: primary care, cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery: 170 total hours (probably mediocre LOR)
- EMT-B (wasn't on my AMCAS, but was on a couple secondaries and mentioned during interviews)
- volunteer chess coach (again, wasn't on my AMCAS, but mentioned during interviews)
- lots of little stuff like playing guitar, running, built a shed from scratch, etc.
Letters of Recommendation: As per my premed committee members, two of my LORs were "very strong" (their words). My other three LORs (physician whom I shadowed, computer science prof., mol. bio prof.) were probably, what I consider to be, mediocre (i.e. average). I think it's important to understand the difference between a mediocre LOR and a strong LOR because a lot of people on SDN like to say that all of their LORs are strong. While it might be true in some cases, it probably isn't in most. A mediocre letter says really nice things about you: hard worker, works well with others, is a pleasure to have in class, received the best grade in my class, will be a wonderful physician, etc. In other words, there is nothing stellar or horrible about a mediocre letter, it's just that everyone's letter writers will say similar things. They obviously like you and want to do everything they can to help you get into med school. Although they say great things in their letter, the reality is that it's just an average letter -- no one is going to say bad things about you unless they really hate you. I know that my three mediocre letters said wonderful things, but they weren't the letters that got me interviews. My two strong LORs did that. Strong LOR #1 came from one of the people in charge of hospital volunteering. From day 1, she loved me. I covered shifts in short notice when others cancelled (volunteered like ten four hour shifts in two weeks one time), I trained over a dozen people and always got positive feedback, I was proactive (i.e. didn't just sit around waiting to be told what to do), and just had a great relationship with her for the two years I was there. She even gave me a graduation present -- she told me she had never given a volunteer a present before. Yeah, I felt loved lol. I wasn't surprised when my premed committee told me she wrote a strong letter. Strong LOR #2 was written by my academic advisor, honors advisor, thesis advisor, and professor for two of his graduate courses. Needless to say, he was heavily involved in my academics. I've known him since freshman year and we've had a great relationship throughout. I've been to his house, met his family, spent many hours in his office and his lab. He knew me best at Penn State. Again, I wasn't surprised that his LOR was strong. At the risk of sounding mushy, strong LORs come from those who love you and know you very, very well.
Committee Interview: 9/22 (was the earliest available)
Committee Letter Received on 9/30
AMCAS Verified on 9/28
By most standards, my application was considered late, which I am sure has had some effect on how things turned out. I'm not complaining though. No sir.
****************************************************************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************************************************************
Personal Statement. Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should ANY part of my personal statement be replicated. Thank you. By no means do I feel I did my best job writing my PS, especially given that I wrote it before even shadowing physicians. But alas, I was too lazy to modify it lol. Instead, I wrote "mini personal statements" in my EC section of the AMCAS for my shadowing experiences.
Doctors are not healers. They do not help people, and they certainly are not admirable. That is how I
genuinely felt when I was younger. For as far back as I can remember I used to have sharp, recurring
abdominal pains. I visited a number of doctors in my youth, but none of them were able to help me. I
always received the same diagnosis: tummy ache. My treatment: endure it. By my mid-teens, I had
stopped seeing doctors for it entirely. It was just a waste of time.
I grew up never wanting to be a doctor.
During my college entrance physical, not unusually, I suffered from abdominal pains. Dr. Khan was
brought in -- he was a gastroenterologist at that clinic. The first thing he did after he introduced himself
was shake my hand. No doctor had ever shaken my hand before him, and he talked to me as if I were
his own son. I will never forget the compassion and understanding in his voice during our meetings. He
was determined to find out why I was in so much pain and so he had met with me over the course of
several weeks. He found the answer: parasites in my GI tract that were eroding away my intestine. I
could not believe it. They had been there for most of my life, but with just a few pills a day for a month,
they were gone.
I remember thinking, "There aren't enough doctors like Dr. Khan in this world..." At the time, I was not
thinking about myself filling that role.
My desire to be a physician did not grow overnight -- not after so many years of disappointment.
Rather, it grew gradually. I studied engineering because I loved math and physics. Over time, my
chemistry and biology courses certainly piqued my interest as well and I began to consider the field of
medicine. My major of engineering science allowed me to study a broad range of engineering
disciplines as my interests changed over time. In my senior year, I received firsthand experience in the
field of neural engineering. I studied the brain from a different perspective than in my biology classes. I
began to appreciate just how complicated medicine could be when looked at through the eyes of a
mathematician or physicist. It was then that I understood how naïve I was about medicine; it is not just
about memorizing reactions and hormone functions -- it is more about understanding the elegant
interconnectivity of all the sciences as they pertain to the human body. I just know that it is the perfect
field for me to continue studying.
My decision to be a physician was inspired by Dr. Khan, of course, but developed further during my
time volunteering in the emergency room. I was given a big role there: comforting patients. This is
actually something that I had trouble with early on; I was frustratingly uncomfortable around patients. It
was partially because I felt so useless. After all, I was just a pre-med who could not diagnose, treat,
educate, give a prognosis, or heal. It was difficult talking to patients and hearing their pain knowing that
I would not be able to do anything about it. It was then that I knew I wanted to be a physician. I
eventually overcame that awkwardness by accepting my limitations and doing all I could do -- listen
and comfort. As a physician, I will be able to do so much more to diagnose and treat patients, but I
won't lose sight of these important emotional responsibilities.
My most meaningful experience in the emergency room was not even with a patient. A young mother
sat in the corner of her room holding her six-month-old baby in her arms with obvious fear and distress
painted across her face. All I knew was that her child had a fever. She politely refused when I offered
her something to eat and drink, stating that she would be leaving soon. Reluctantly, I accepted that
and went off continuing my duties. Half an hour later I returned to her room and found she was still
there. Again I offered; again she refused. I then told her I would bring her graham crackers and a
random drink anyway, so she might as well tell me what she wanted so that I wouldn't have to make
two trips. She smiled, sighed, and told me she would like orange juice. I did not see her after that, but
she had told her nurse how much that meant to her. It was then that I learned that the patient is not the
only one treated; family and loved ones are equally important. That feeling of helping someone, even a
little bit, in that kind of situation is one I hope to never forget. Just seeing her smile was enough.
I have learned that my earlier physicians were not incompetent; the practice of medicine is just an
imperfect science. With the rising age of baby-boomers and the increasing physician shortage,
physicians of my generation face even greater challenges ahead. I want to take on these
responsibilities and challenges. As a physician I would have such an amazing and important role,
continually learn about medicine, serve to alleviate human suffering, develop meaningful relationships
with patients and understand their feelings, and teach and inspire others. I aspire to become for others
the physician that Dr. Khan was for me.
AMCAS submitted: 9/1/2011
Applied, Rejected
Northwestern University - "SR 10/3 | R1/30: Did not complete secondary -- realized I had no real reason to apply to schools in ..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: No
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/3 | R1/30: Did not complete secondary -- realized I had no real reason to apply to schools in Chicago, far away from friends/family.
Application Complete, Rejected
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/25/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/15 | SS 9/25 | C 11/15 | "Continue to Review" 12/8 | R 4/18
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/27/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/26 | SS 9/27 | R 5/8
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/30/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/19 | SS 9/30 | C 10/3 | R 10/16
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/3/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/29 | SS 10/3 | R 3/6
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/4/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/29 | SS 10/4 | R 1/25
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/4/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/19 | SS 10/4 | C 11/10 | R 1/30
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/4/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/4 | SS 10/4 | R 4/13
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/5/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/29 | SS 10/5 | C10/6 | R 1/12
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/9/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/6 | SS 10/9 | R 1/26
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/12/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/5 | SS 10/12 | R 2/29: Leap Day rejection an hour before my Albany interview :(
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/13/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/12 | SS 10/13 | C 10/25 | R 3/2
Yale University - "SR 10/1 | SS 10/17 | R 3/15: I spent quite some time on this secondary. Disappointed but not surpris..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/17/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/1 | SS 10/17 | R 3/15: I spent quite some time on this secondary. Disappointed but not surprised.
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/18/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 10/18 | SS 10/18 | C 12/7 | R 5/5
New York University - "SR 9/29 | SS 10/25 | C 11/15 | R 2/15:
From what I've read on SDN, having your application compl..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/25/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/29 | SS 10/25 | C 11/15 | R 2/15:
From what I've read on SDN, having your application complete after October leaves you virtually zero chance to get an interview (I was complete Nov 15th, of course). I'm not sure whether this is true, but it's something worth looking into if you're getting ready to apply to schools. I probably wasted money and lots of time on the secondary essays.
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/25/2011
- Interview Invite: No
- Interview Attended: No
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/26 | SS 10/25 | C 12/5 | R 3/23
Attended Interview, Rejected
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/13/2011
- Interview Invite: 2/8/2012
- Interview Attended: 3/30/2012
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
SR 9/29 | SS 10/13 | C 10/27 | II 2/8 | IA 3/30 | R 4/20:
Loved it! This gorgeous $200 million medical school is state of the art, very modern, very impressive. There is a strong sense of community at this school and the surrounding area. My interviewer said “TCMC students are like rock stars around here.” I don’t remember what the faculty:student ratio is, but it’s something ridiculous. There’s like 800 volunteer clinical science faculty members within the TCMC campuses (the main one is in Scranton, but there are two others in the surrounding northeast Pennsylvania (NEPA) region).
The first two years are organ based I think (I was kind of zoning out during the presentation) and grading is pass/fail. Much more interesting is third year, though. The clerkships aren’t divided into blocks like every other school I’ve seen. Instead, throughout the entire year, you’re taking all your clerkships at once. For example, on Monday morning, you have internal med, then during the afternoon, surgery; Tuesday morning ob/gyn, afternoon: psych, etc. Each half day is a different clerkship that you continue throughout the year (a couple of them may be twice a week, like surgery). They feel there is better continuity of care this way, and you’re more likely to remember the skills learned. During these rotations, you’re actually with an attending the whole time, unlike other schools where you might be with just the residents. It’s probably not uncommon at other schools for attendings to give out grades based on what the residents tell them because they don’t spend enough time with the students. Here, the attendings know their students very well.
The professors are willing to do whatever they can to help their students succeed. After all, the students’ success makes the school look good. Win-win. My interviewer was telling me about how he’s friends with a lot of the residency directors and will make phone calls to them to discuss his students when it comes time to match. Obviously, he’s not going to lie since his credibility is on the line, but he could very well have a strong influence if he feels his student deserves it. I checked out his credentials online, and he’s definitely legit lol. I wouldn’t have expected someone with his pedigree to be here, but here he is. I’m willing to bet that those phone calls could be a serious advantage in the match. In medicine, i.e. business, sometimes who you know is more important than what you know.
The three students we ate lunch with, all MS2s, were very cool. My student interviewer, however, was pretty dull. It was a boring half hour of her asking questions off a piece of paper: strength, weakness, how do you deal with stress, greatest challenge, etc. – the typical generic questions one after another with little actual conversation. That was a bit of a turn-off. Why even volunteer to be an interviewer if you’re not going to make an effort to get to know the applicants? But anyway, my faculty interview was great. He was a really interesting guy and did most of the talking. Both of those interviews are semi-blind, i.e. they have your personal statements and secondary essays but no stats. The exit interview is supposed to be open file, but my interviewer was really busy and didn’t get a chance to read my app. She was really nice though and we talked about other things. Overall, I had a really good vibe from everyone there.
I asked my interviewer about research (his background was from research heavy schools) and he assured me that for such a new school, the research opportunities here are great and are only going to get better. Other than that, I don’t know much about how good the research is at this school. Like every other school I’ve interviewed at, I assume it’s adequate for competitive specialties.
The 16-county area of NEPA has a significantly higher % of residents over 65 than average, making this location an excellent choice for those who are interested in geriatrics. The area has cheap housing near campus and quite a few colleges in the area. A car is absolutely necessary as the rotations sites may be a bit scattered. There is talk about an affiliation with the University of Scranton. There’s nothing official yet, but it’ll probably happen. That affiliation will certainly benefit both TCMC and the U of S. TCMC is on financial probation by the LCME, but they emphasized that they’re not worried at all about getting fully accredited. Not even the students seemed the least bit worried.
For out-of-staters, TCMC does have a strong preference for PA residents, but there were at least a couple fellow interviewees from out of state. One interviewee and one current student were from California. Don’t be too discouraged to apply if you feel you won’t have a shot here without strong ties to NEPA.
This school is by far the closest one to home and I think I would be a great fit here. There is really nothing about the school that I didn’t like. I’ll get the decision on April 20. Fingers crossed.
Attended Interview, Waitlisted, Withdrew
University of Rochester - "
Withdrew
SR 9/29 | SS 9/29 | C 10/1 | II 12/8 | IA 1/26 | WL 2/16 | W 5/3:
Meliora
..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/29/2011
- Interview Invite: 12/8/2011
- Interview Attended: 1/26/2012
- Waitlisted: 2/16/2012
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
Withdrew
SR 9/29 | SS 9/29 | C 10/1 | II 12/8 | IA 1/26 | WL 2/16 | W 5/3:
Meliora
The philosophy of the school sets them apart from every other school I’ve looked into. They strongly emphasize the art of medicine and humanism involved in patient care over just a mastery of the sciences. Their approach to medicine and medical education can best be understood by looking up “biopsychosocial model.” One of my interviewers told me that, “in order to understand a disease, you must first understand your patient.” Interestingly, he did his best to dissuade me from considering attending Columbia because he feels that, due to the way they teach, there is too much of a disconnect between patients and medicine there. (Why did he tell me that? I have no idea. I didn’t mention Columbia at all beforehand.)
Like Pittsburgh, my fellow interviewees were from top schools: Cornell (15% of the class comes from there), Dartmouth, Stanford, Duke, and Johns Hopkins come to mind. The school is strong on research (but a project isn’t required for graduation) and has a five year academic research track that I’m very interested in – I definitely don’t want to pursue a Ph.D. but would be happy to spend a year doing research in a program tailored for a career in academic medicine. I was told that Rochester graduates are well suited for academic medicine and that if you look at all the current Deans of Medicine in the country, the highest frequency went to Harvard Medical School; the second highest went to Rochester. Interesting.
The curriculum here is uniquely organized in what they call the “Double Helix Curriculum.” Again, that is also something you should look up on their website. There are basic sciences and clinical experiences throughout all four years. As far as I know, no other school I’ve looked into has basic sciences in the clinical third and fourth years. These classes cover the sciences related to the clerkships that were just completed. Essentially, they cover “extra stuff” that other schools don’t in order to help you appreciate the basic sciences as you go through your rotations. Just to be clear though, it’s not as if two years of basic science is spread out over four. You spend the first two years learning what everyone else is learning and take Step I. During the clerkship years however, there are additional basic science classes between some of the rotations. Pretty cool, right? Also, their first two years are pass/fail. There doesn’t seem to be any competition among students here. The overall atmosphere is very relaxed.
Lectures aren’t recorded! When I first heard that, I was almost ready to run away. But after talking with current students, I realized that it’s not a big deal at all. One student told me only about 60% of people show up for lectures, and the ones who don’t do just as well on exams anyway. Everything is on the syllabi, so class attendance isn’t mandatory. It’s not as if I plan on skipping out on lectures, but rather that I wouldn’t want to be in an “attendance is mandatory or else…” kind of environment. Also, starting next year, all students are getting iPads with all the notes preloaded onto them. No more paper syllabi. Sweet!! They do a lot of PBL and all of the students I talked to loved it. One of the students said that because they do PBL so often, (three times a week, two hours each, I believe) they’re really good at it and enjoy it.
The hospital complex is huge, attractive, and I think all connected. It’s a bit of a maze – I had to ask for help locating my second interviewer’s room, and even then they had trouble pointing me in the right direction. Rochester isn’t the largest city, but they do get trauma from Buffalo and Syracuse. Some people don’t like how much snow they get, but I love snow, so that’s a good thing to me. It felt like a nice place to live, somewhere I’d be very comfortable. There is plenty of housing on and off campus with very affordable rent. Right across the street is the School of Nursing and the undergrad campus is nearby as well (I didn’t see it though).
Overall, I love the school and think I’d be a good fit. I’m hoping they agree. We’ll see what happens.
Hofstra University - "
Withdrew
SR 9/30 | SS 9/30 | II 11/1 | IA 2/17 | WL 3/26 | W 5/3:
Don’t judge a med..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/30/2011
- Interview Invite: 11/1/2011
- Interview Attended: 2/17/2012
- Waitlisted: 3/26/2012
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
Withdrew
SR 9/30 | SS 9/30 | II 11/1 | IA 2/17 | WL 3/26 | W 5/3:
Don’t judge a medical school by its cover. On SDN, some people talked about Hofstra as if it were a safety school. It isn’t. This medical school is new, innovative, and definitely promising. Hofstra University is a private school in Long Island with a great reputation. The North Shore-LIJ healthcare system is among the largest in the US and already has residency programs well established throughout. It was only natural for the two to come together to create a medical school. Last year they admitted their inaugural class of 40. Their average MCAT was 33. This year’s incoming class will be composed of 60.
One of the many advantages of starting up a medical school is that they get to create their own curriculum. To divide the years into preclinical and clinical would be an oversimplification. All four years are heavily clinical. The beginning of first year starts off with an EMT crash course to be certified in NY. I forget how often they run on the ambulances, but it’s significant. They are active EMTs throughout the first year, maybe even the second year as well. The students (MS1s) already have a ton of clinical experience, well beyond any first or second year student I’ve met at other schools. Throughout the first two years is ongoing (at least a few hours per week, but as much as you want) training in being a clinician. Students have already (under supervision) done history and physical exams, participated in differentials, delivered a baby, scrubbed in on surgeries, etc. The idea is simple: you learn by doing. The students were sort of thrown into the lion’s den on week one. The faculty are convinced that Hofstra graduates will be the most experienced interns in the country.
There are no lectures. Well, maybe an hour or two a week, tops, but that’s it. Most of the learning is based on PBL and self study. The material is divided into systems. Anatomy spans the entire two years. There are also no multiple choice tests. The assessments are based on essays, presentations, and real or simulated scenarios on a pass/fail basis.
The simulation lab is huge! I think they said it’s the largest in the country.
With a health system so large, research is aplenty. One of my interviewers told me that, based on how much research funding they have, he would expect Hofstra to rank at least in the top 20 on the USNews research rankings.
This school almost sounds too good to be true. And unfortunately, there is no proof that this curriculum actually works. The current MS1s took a leap of faith to attend, and they don’t regret it at all. They’re the happiest students I’ve met so far.
The medical school is on the Hofstra University campus, but the clinical sites are scattered. A car is definitely needed as you’ll have to do a lot of driving.
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/3/2011
- Interview Invite: 12/19/2011
- Interview Attended: 3/16/2012
- Waitlisted: 4/10/2012
- Accepted: No
Summary of Experience:
Withdrew
SR 9/30 | SS 10/3 | C 10/19 | II 12/19 | IA 3/16 | "High Priority" WL 4/10 | W 5/3:
I didn’t get much sleep, left early anticipating traffic, and drove two hours the morning of. What a bad idea that was lol.
I’ll start with the interview. My interviewer was perfectly nice, but I was tired. She didn’t ask a single difficult question and yet there was barely a modicum of coherency in any of my answers. I’ll make sure to contribute to the “Worst Interview Answers” thread on SDN when I get rejected here. For now, I’ll leave it at that. Interviews #1-4 (Pitt, Temple, Rochester, Hofstra) were good, #5 (Albany) was wonderful, and now #6 was just garbage. I would be very surprised to not be rejected. Moral of the story: sleep well before your interviews!!
The preclinical curriculum is very traditional. Many schools tend to organize the information in different ways, but it doesn’t seem as if it makes a big difference. Most of the learning is self-study anyway. What is great here is that the grading is true pass/fail. Most other pass/fail schools, Pitt for example, have internal rankings for Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA). Not here. You get a pass and move on with no lasting record of how you did. Only clerkship grades are considered for AOA membership. I met quite a number of students, and they all emphasized how non-competitive the class is. The friendliness of the class reminded me a lot of Temple. The students here are very laid back.
Research seems excellent. The Price Center/Block Pavilion is pretty huge and aesthetic, though I didn’t go inside. I heard they recruited researchers from other NYC schools. A thesis is required for graduation and there is a lot of research funding. There is generous support for doing research abroad, of which many students have taken advantage. I interviewed on Match Day. I’ll admit I don’t know much about residency programs, but the match list for this year seemed impressive.
There is guaranteed, cheap housing on campus for all four years. The school is in a nice area in the Bronx and the undergrad campus is in upper Manhattan about five miles away. It takes about half an hour to get to midtown Manhattan. They are affiliated with large hospitals throughout NYC. Clinical experience seems great here. A car probably isn’t needed.
The tour guides had an earlier class than normal and had to cut the tour short. But overall, I was very impressed with Einstein. Like I already mentioned, I’m not expecting an offer of admission here as I’m sure I didn’t leave a good impression on my interviewer, but we’ll see.
Update: It is worth mentioning that virtually no one on SDN who interviewed after January 1st received an outright offer of admission. They were either rejected, waitlisted, or high priority waitlisted. There seemed to be good waitlist movement in May.
Accepted off Waitlist
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/5/2011
- Interview Invite: 10/6/2011
- Interview Attended: 11/16/2011
- Waitlisted: 12/15/2011
- Accepted: 4/4/2012
Summary of Experience:
Matriculating
SR 9/29 | SS 10/5 | II 10/6 | IA 11/16 | WL 12/15 | A 4/4 | SL 4/27 | FA 5/1 | M 5/3:
Updated: 5/8/12
Since Pitt was my first interview, my earlier review didn’t reflect how I currently feel about the school now that I’ve interviewed at six others. Hopefully this review will better represent Pitt for future applicants.
My first impression was that Pittsburgh was a little overwhelming. After going back for second look, I still feel the same way. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) is one of the largest hospital systems in the US. Both the hospital and the medical school are consistently ranked in the top 20 according to USNews (currently 12 and 15 respectively). A major advantage that Pitt has over schools in larger cities (e.g. Philadelphia, NYC, Boston) is that they don’t have to share hospitals or patients with other medical schools. The major disadvantage is that their location isn’t all that attractive to many applicants who prefer to live in a large city full of excitement. Of course, this isn’t a disadvantage for everyone. I’ve never lived in a city, so I probably wouldn’t be that comfortable in a large city. Pittsburgh feels about right for me.
Pitt does block scheduling for the preclinical years. Students tend to like block scheduling since they get to focus on one topic at a time. There are also longitudinal courses which include clinical experiences, ethics, law, medical decision making, scientific reasoning, etc. Most of the first year is just the basic sciences while the second year is organ system pathophysiology. This is fairly typical among schools. Grading is now pass/fail (formerly honors/pass/fail). I do believe there will be an internal ranking going on for Alpha Omega Alpha membership (medical honor society), but I’m not positive. Either way, pass/fail is definitely a good thing. Unranked would’ve been better. I forget how often they do PBL – probably a few hours a week? Some like it, some don’t. It’s supposed to help develop important skills, so I’ll do my best to approach it with an open mind.
It’s difficult to gage the quality of third year rotations as an applicant, but I have no reason to doubt that they are of the highest quality here, given their exclusivity to UPMC. Their match list is outstanding! Roughly two thirds matched into the most prestigious academic medical centers. Pitt obviously has a great reputation among residency program directors for their clinical excellence.
Pitt is #6 in terms of NIH grants, i.e. research is a big deal here. The research opportunities are endless. If you can think it, you can do it. A scholarly project is required and there is a lot of support given to students. They understand when a student goes three months without working on their project at all to concentrate on studying. So although it’s required, it’s not as if they’ll be hounding you to work x hours per week or something. You have a lot of freedom with it.
According to Forbes, Pittsburgh is the most livable city in the US. It’s very affordable, has plenty of apartments within walking distance to the school, has decent public transportation, has one of the lowest crime rates compared to other cities, and has over a dozen colleges or campuses. I know I’ll like living here. For me, the only downside is that home is about five hours away. But, it’s not that bad.
Like many, many people, I was waitlisted after my interview. I don’t know the exact numbers, but they waitlist ~75%, accept ~10% , and reject ~15%. My fellow interviewees were from top colleges: Harvard, Stanford, Duke, etc. I was honestly pretty intimidated by interview day and didn’t think I would be pulled off the waitlist. After interview season was over, Pitt was unquestionably my top choice, so I was ecstatic to get accepted. Second look was awesome and it made me like the school even more. After getting my financial aid package (awarded $36k need-based scholarship, re-evaluated each year), the decision was easy. Even if I were offered more money from any of the remaining five schools, I wouldn’t have turned Pitt down. So, in fairness to other applicants, I promptly withdrew from the other five schools and will be matriculating. This is definitely the right school for me.
Pitt Med is simply amazing. While I liked all seven schools for different reasons, Pitt easily stands out from the rest. And by that, I don’t mean their USNews rankings. Of the seven schools, Pitt seems to be the best in each of these categories: match list, research, hospitals, world-renown faculty, cost of living, reputation among residency program directors, and need-based financial aid.
Being a late applicant, I went into the application game with the mindset of “I’ll take whatever I can get. If I can score one acceptance, I don’t care where, I’ll be happy.” It’s unbelievable how things turned out. Pitt Med class of 2016!!
Accepted
Temple University - "
Withdrew
SR 9/29 | SS 9/30 | II 11/7 | IA 11/30 | A 12/20 | SL 3/23 | W 5/3:
Temple j..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 9/30/2011
- Interview Invite: 11/7/2011
- Interview Attended: 11/30/2011
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: 12/20/2011
Summary of Experience:
Withdrew
SR 9/29 | SS 9/30 | II 11/7 | IA 11/30 | A 12/20 | SL 3/23 | W 5/3:
Temple just spent somewhere around $160 million on a brand new, state-of-the-art medical school a few years ago. It is seriously amazing. Although it is situated in the middle of a very bad neighborhood, the medical school is very safe, shiny, and fully equipped. All in one building are the anatomy labs that barely smell of formaldehyde thanks to their air filtration system, simulations labs, research labs, classrooms, libraries, etc. I didn’t see much of the hospitals, but they’re right across the street. Aesthetically and practically, the facilities are wonderful.
Although Temple isn’t a research heavy school (no required research or anything), I think their research opportunities are more than adequate for those who want to get involved and published. On interview day, they seemed to be really proud of their clinical rotations. Their emphasis was more on that rather than their research.
It’s hard to describe why exactly, but I think I just fit in more with the student body at Temple than at a more “prestigious” school like Pittsburgh or Rochester. As a stark contrast to my interviews at those two schools, none of my fellow interviewees were from Ivy-level undergrads. I’m not trying to imply that Temple students aren’t as smart, but rather they weren’t quite as haughty as some others I met on the interview trail. The interview day had a totally different feel to it. I was a bit more comfortable talking with my fellow interviewees and current students here than at those other schools. The professor who interviewed me emphasized how the students here are more like a family than just classmates, and I definitely got that impression as well. For me at least, this carries a lot of weight when it comes time to make a decision if I’m fortunate enough to have multiple acceptances. Above all else, I want to be comfortable at whichever school I decide to attend.
Temple grades honors/pass/fail for preclinical years. Current students emphasized that although there is honors, there is no competition among students since honors is based only on your grade (I think 92% and could be lowered for particularly difficult exams) and not on class performance. Meaning, everyone can honor a course if they all score 92% (i.e. it’s not just top x% or something). Do honoring preclinicals matter for residency placement? Not nearly as much as Step I scores. I slightly prefer pass/fail over honors/pass/fail to reduce the stress a little, but it’s only a minor consideration.
Temple organizes the preclinical years into blocks. I have heard from many people that block scheduling is the way to go. You’re able to really focus in on one topic at a time and get much needed breaks in between the blocks. The only downside I can foresee about blocks is that, if you don’t like the topic(s) of a particular block, you’re stuck with it for several weeks. You have to “get through it” before you move onto something you enjoy more. I’m sure everyone has a topic or two that they won’t care for, and those blocks might suck. There seems to be a lot of PBL. I’m not quite sure yet whether this is a positive or negative. My gut tells me positive.
Throughout the preclinical curriculum is ongoing clinical experience. This is a plus. It’s not just a dichotomy of books for two years and patients for two years. They seem to be meshed together nicely.
Temple’s location has some good and some bad. Being in the middle of a bad neighborhood, there is no student housing near campus. Students have at minimum a 10-15 minute commute. Also, the medical school is isolated from the undergrad campus. I forget how far away they are, probably like 20 or so blocks? It probably seems farther to me than it actually is. As a big plus though, Temple is big on trauma. Being interested in surgery, this is appealing.
I was accepted five days before Christmas. Talk about an amazing Christmas present! I would be perfectly happy to attend here. Any other acceptances at this point is gravy.
Update: Withdrew after receiving financial aid package from Pittsburgh. Didn't receive a scholarship here and was told that financial aid packages would be sent out after May 15th. Seriously? Sorry, Temple, but I just can't wait that long. I guess it wasn't meant to be.
Albany Medical College - "
Withdrew
SR 10/4 | SS 10/9 | II 1/10 | IA 2/29 | A 3/8 | W 5/3:
I left the school fee..."
Combined PhD/MSTP: No
- Submitted: Yes
- Secondary Completed: 10/9/2011
- Interview Invite: 1/10/2012
- Interview Attended: 2/29/2012
- Waitlisted: No
- Accepted: 3/8/2012
Summary of Experience:
Withdrew
SR 10/4 | SS 10/9 | II 1/10 | IA 2/29 | A 3/8 | W 5/3:
I left the school feeling as if I hadn’t learned a whole lot about it. I only saw two students the entire day, just one faculty member (my interviewer), and the tour was very brief (like 15 minutes?). The day started at 11:15am and finished before 3:00pm. It was by far the shortest interview day. It doesn’t mean I was unimpressed by the school, it just means I want to learn a lot more about it. Without an official second day look (which I think would have been immensely helpful), I’ll have to revisit sometime in late April/early May before May 15.
The emphasis was on their clinical training. Albany Medical College is the only medical school and teaching hospital within a 120 mile radius. They provide primary to tertiary care for 3 million residents in 25 counties throughout NY and New England. So, unlike schools in metropolitan areas (e.g. Philly and NYC), there is no need to share patients with other medical schools. This is a big plus.
The preclinical curriculum is based on organ system modules. There are longitudinal themes that run throughout, including clinical skills, ethics, evidence-based medicine, nutrition, and informatics, with the focus on clinical presentations. All of that sounds great. The only problem I have is with their so called “modified pass/fail” grading system. It’s definitely a misnomer. The top x% get honors (I think they call it “high excellence” or something), next y% get high pass, and the rest pass or fail based on their grade. Yuck. It’s an H/HP/P/F grading system. The two students I met said there is zero competition at the school, but honestly, I find that a little hard to believe. When only five or so (I forget how many) students can honor a course, I’d be willing to bet there is going to be some competition and added stress among the top ten or twenty students, even if the other 80% of the class is relatively non-competitive. That’s the problem with meeting two students, I can really only speculate right now.
In terms of research, I don’t really know. The two students (MSI and MSII) weren’t involved with much research yet. They said it was easy to get involved though. There hasn’t seemed to be any problems with research opportunities at any of the other schools I’ve interviewed at, and I wouldn’t expect there to be any problems here either. Considering that there is an MDDR track (MD with Distinction in Research), I assume the research here is more than adequate for competitive specialties.
AMC isn’t affiliated with a university, i.e. there are no undergrad or grad programs easily accessible to the medical students. Some people have said that it’s a good thing since then those pesky premeds aren’t getting in the way of your clinical training. I don’t really buy it. I think there are definite advantages to being affiliated with a university. For example, there are no official dual degree programs here. I’m interested in possibly pursuing an MBA. It would be a little tricky to do here. Not impossible, but tricky. Then again, I can also earn the degree later on as well, during residency for example.
The one exceptional highlight about the school was the interview. Without question, this was the best interview I’ve had so far. The professor was one of the friendliest people I have ever met. She was genuinely interested in my story and the entire one-hour interview was stress-free. I just felt so comfortable the entire time. Toward the end of the interview, she actually said to me, “What else can I say to you to convince you to come here?” I was accepted a week later and she wrote a very nice email that same day. This school gets serious points for such an outstanding faculty member. However, it’s worth noting that based on the interview feedback on SDN, some interviews at this school were very high-stress. I might have just lucked out.
I asked the two students why they choose this school and neither had actual reasons other than family nearby. There’s certainly nothing wrong about wanting to stay close to family, but they didn’t give any other reason. Because I don’t know as much about this school as I would like, there’s nothing that really stands out enough for me to choose it over Temple. Don’t get me wrong, it seems like a great school, and I'm very grateful for being offered admission, but I’m just not sold yet. If I weren't already accepted to Temple, I wouldn't hesitate to attend AMC.
Update: Withdrew after receiving financial aid package from Pittsburgh. Didn't receive a financial aid package from AMC, but it wouldn't have mattered anyway. I knew I wouldn't choose AMC over Pitt.
Summary of Application Experience
Abbreviations:
SR = Secondary Received
SS = Secondary Sent
C = Application Complete (as per "complete" emails)
II = Interview Invite
IA = Interview Attended
R = Rejected
W = Withdrew
WL = Waitlisted
A = Accepted
SL = Second Look Attended
FA = Financial Aid Package Received
M = Decision to Matriculate
** Don't forget to click on the schools above for their reviews **